During the first 23 years of my practice, I would never have questioned whether viruses are real. While I was in college, however, I heard of alternate theories such as Terrain Theory, which proposes HIV is not the cause of AID's but rather AID's is caused by environmental/food toxicity and drug use. Terrain Theory contends that the body can deal with outside microbial invaders if the Terrain (the body) is strong. Only when the body is weakened by poor nutrition, toxins, and environmental pollution (chemical and electromagnetic), do we get sick. Terrain Theory disputes the existence of viruses, arguing that they are unable to meet the standards of the Germ Theory Model. The golden standard of the Germ Theory model, referred to as Koch's Postulates, does not apply to viruses according to conventional science. As you will soon learn, conventional science adds irreducible complexity to keep flawed theories in motion.
The points that the Terrain Theory argues are interesting, but I never put much mental energy into delving into the topic deeply. After the most recent pandemic, which I refer to as "what we all went through in 2020", I started to rethink the possibility that the diseases we attribute to viral infectious agents may have an alternate mechanism. A large crack in trust and credibility was opened during the pandemic. Inconsistencies in the scientific method as a result of the health authorities' response to this new illness caused many trained health professionals to question what the public was being told. Why were they counting deaths from people in car accidents/murders? Why were they using PCR tests for diagnosis? PCR tests only give the length and weight of DNA and RNA strands, which is not useful in detecting genetic material of viral origin at all. These tests could be showing DNA and RNA from dead host cells or a foreign source of DNA and RNA. They cannot distinguish origin, just the size of the fragments.
The illness that was spreading across the globe did not make much sense to a Physician with a keen sense of discernment. The symptoms did not match up to how a virus was supposed to behave, and the reactions of the CDC and WHO made no sense. Nothing was making sense, and when the authorities are not making sense, it is ultimately just deception.
First, a virus is very specific to a host and the type of cells in which it infects. This virus was supposedly infecting pets as carriers, which, again, to anyone trained in the medical profession this naturally makes no sense. A virus is host-specific and cannot reproduce or sit idly by in a random host.
In the same fashion, a virus is selective about which cells within a host it will infect. This particular virus infects cells that have an ACE 2 (an Angiotensin-converting enzyme) receptor on it. These receptors are primarily found in the lungs and kidneys, but are also located in the testes, lining of blood vessels, lining of the heart, and lining of the gut. So, according to the viral theory of disease, the virus would infect these cells, reproduce, and eventually destroy them as a result. Firstly, this is strange because the type of virus that was attributed to the new disease usually infects the lining of the gut and respiratory tracts, resulting in symptoms attributed to the common cold or a stomach bug. This new version took on a whole new level of destructive power during its time, supposedly within the bat population. The symptoms of this type of virus would only realistically resemble a common cold due to its interactions with the lining of the airways and GI tract. The symptoms of this new virus should primarily relate to the lining of the blood vessels, heart, and kidneys. The ACE 2 receptor deals with the regulation of blood pressure, so the lining of the heart and blood vessels, and kidneys should be the areas primarily affected.
According to the CDC, the new symptoms of this infection are:
- Fever or chills
- Cough
- Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
- Fatigue
- Muscle or body aches
- Headache
- New loss of taste or smell
- Sore throat
- Congestion or a runny nose
- Nausea or vomiting
- Diarrhea
Ultimately, the symptoms are the same as Influenza (which binds to sialic acid receptors of the upper and lower respiratory tract), and it does not align with the nature of an ACE 2 virus. This virus should lead to inflammation of the cardiovascular and renal systems, which is not even part of the symptoms list. Only in advanced disease, in a small percentage of infections, does the cardiovascular or renal system get affected. The primary symptoms of this virus resemble the influenza virus with a lot more punch.
Actually, the symptoms are shared among all viral infections, but the only difference is the organs that are affected. For example:
Chicken Pox: Per the CDC
- fever
- tiredness
- loss of appetite
- swollen lymph nodes
- headache
Shingles: Per the CDC
- headache
- skin rash
- chills
- upset stomach
- swollen lymph nodes
Mumps: Per the CDC
- fever
- headache
- muscle aches
- tiredness
- swollen lymph nodes
- loss of appetite
Mononucleosis: Per the CDC
- fatigue
- fever
- Headache
- skin rash
- swollen lymph nodes
Hepatitis: Per the CDC
- fatigue
- low-grade fever
- itching
- loss of appetite
- nausea and vomiting
- Skin rash
Each disease has varying types of rashes associated with them, the only difference is the organ system involved with it. The main complaints are the same, which are grouped and referred to as malaise. When you are sick with a virus, you feel malaise. None of the symptoms of malaise are directly related to the virus entering the target organ it shares receptor affinity with. For example, when you are sick with the Flu, the worst symptoms are body aches, fatigue, headache, and fever. None of these relates to an infection of the epithelial cells of your respiratory tract. The proponents of the viral theory of illness attribute malaise to the immune system doing its job. How? What part of the antibody response or white blood cell function makes the muscles hurt? What is the mechanism of fever? Why did this new disease cause muscle injury in the heart? Why do people lose their sense of taste and smell? The symptoms do not relate to the theory of the agent of the disease in all viral illnesses. The entire thing appears to be a case of adding irreducible complexity to an illness to explain the main symptoms of the illness while at the same time avoiding the fact that the main symptoms of the disease should be cellular damage as a result of the pathogen. In the case of the viral models, the main target tissues of the infection are not involved until the late stage. The late stage of the illness is the cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, nervous, and biliary (liver) systems. Is it possible that the mechanism is not tissue-specific but instead systemic? Malaise is a systemic process involving energy production at the cellular level of multiple types of cells; the highest energy-utilizing cells are affected first. The nervous system, musculoskeletal, cardiac, and gastrointestinal systems in respected order are affected first.
The most unique and important part about "the thing we all went through in 2020" was the widespread nature of the illness. This part is the most revealing factor leading to the cause of this new disease. It is not possible that a contagious illness could spread this fast. From December 1st (the first case in Wuhan, China) to March 11th, the new thing became a pandemic. So, after three and a half months, this new contagion spread across the entire planet. That is a very fast spread for a disease that needs to incorporate into a host cell before it can reproduce itself. Viruses trick a cell into incorporating it into its own DNA and then trick the cell to keep making more of itself. After this, a virus would also need to get the cell to make its packaging cover (capsid) with all of the necessary receptors needed to attach to another cell receptor. All of this would take a lot of time, not to mention it would also have to leave the host and get lucky enough for another host in very close contact to come along. I am no mathematician, but this does not appear to be possible with my educated sense of judgement.
If we look at this situation through the lens of the Terrain Theory, we would need to find a systemic illness of energy production at the cellular level, which affected a large group of people in the short timeframe. We can rule out nutritional deficiencies and chemical toxins in the food supply pretty easily. Environmental pollution would be a candidate to evaluate, but a chemical pollutant would have been obvious and detected. The less obvious, unseen environmental pollutant would be a new form of electromagnetic energy. Electromagnetic energy would fit the illness of the disease because radiofrequencies have been proven to alter mitochondrial function. Radiofrequency illness, although well documented in multiple studies, is poorly understood/recognized by conventional science. Radiofrequency illness is a disease that affects everyone differently. Some people are highly sensitive to electromagnetic pollution, while others are minimally affected. When a sensitive individual is exposed to a new frequency of man-made electromagnetic energy, it alters their mitochondrial function. Symptoms of acute radiofrequency illness are fatigue, muscle aches/pain, headache, heart palpitations, GI upset, rash, and fever. The introduction of a new frequency would affect the sensitive people first, and over time, more would fall ill. The timeframe of spread would be rapid, but over time, people would adapt to the new frequency. This has not been the case with "what we all went through in 2020." At first, this did occur as expected, but it has not gone away. People continue to get sick with the same disease process over and over.
I did some research looking for a new frequency that was different than anything the world has been exposed to it starting in late 2019. It was obvious to me, so obvious that I had to do a search to see if anyone else considered this. I searched [did the Starlink Satellite network cause COVID]... The only thing I found made me even more suspicious: an abundance of fact-check disinformation. They stated the system has been up since February of 2018, which is true except it was just a couple of prototypes; the first active satellites appeared in October of 2019. They also talked about the same old bait and switch that radio frequencies are not ionizing radiation and do not disturb DNA, resulting in cancer. Again, true, but multiple studies have shown it affects mitochondrial function and the ability of blood to carry oxygen. Two things are correlated with the type of illness that caused the pandemic. I tracked the launches and graphed them, looking for patterns of illness.
It followed a correlation both with the start of the pandemic followed by more satellites launched coincided with increases in illness.
As I continued to track I kept finding more correlation, especially the emergence of delta variant after the month with the most launched to date.
The fall of 2022 is when I was researching this topic, during the summer of 2022 I was paying close attention and expected the resurgence in cases we saw which they called omicron BA.5. At this point very few people were testing but in my clinic I saw more sick people than I had the entire pandemic. That summer it was getting obvious to me that this was a theory worth following.
By late 2023, it had become so obvious to me that radio frequencies were making people ill. What we have all along called the common cold, the flu, or "the thing we all went through in 2020" could very well be linked to electromagnetic pollution.
In late 2023, I published my first book on my findings, The Conscious Canary. In this book, I detail what I have been working on throughout my entire career. What Eastern Medicine describes as Chi flow does exist; Chi is electromagnetic energy. This energy flows with the nervous system, with every nerve level of the spine functioning at a certain combination of frequencies. Electromagnetic pollution is not just affecting mitochondrial function, this pollution can affect any system in the body, depending on which nerve level is affected. Mumps, the Facial cranial nerve VII, Hepatitis, middle thoracic nerves, Shingles, any sensory nerve, etc... The rashes associated with viral illness are a disruption of the function of the epidermal layer of the skin.